Legal Opinion

Alvis v. Saunders

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 14, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond. Decree for defendants. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The facts essential to a clear understanding of this appeal, which involves the propriety of the action of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond in sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiffs’ bill, are shown by the record .to be that Robert Alvis became, in April, 1877, the owner of a valuable estate in Charles City county known as Weyanolce; that he paid part of the purchase money and secured $20,000, the residue thereof, by a deed of trust on the property, bearing even date with the deed conveying the same to him; that in 1885, Alvis being heavily in debt, with numerous judgments against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Claflin v. DunneIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Wilcher v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  3. Neale v. UtzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  4. Watt v. BrookoverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Allan v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. American Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
  2. Beck v. Semones' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. White v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API