Alvis v. Saunders
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond. Decree for defendants. Complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The facts essential to a clear understanding of this appeal, which involves the propriety of the action of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond in sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiffs’ bill, are shown by the record .to be that Robert Alvis became, in April, 1877, the owner of a valuable estate in Charles City county known as Weyanolce; that he paid part of the purchase money and secured $20,000, the residue thereof, by a deed of trust on the property, bearing even date with the deed conveying the same to him; that in 1885, Alvis being heavily in debt, with numerous judgments against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claflin v. DunneIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Wilcher v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
- Neale v. UtzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- Watt v. BrookoverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
- Allan v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barnes v. American Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
- Beck v. Semones' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- White v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947