Legal Opinion
Bell & Howell Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Local 399, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 18, 1979No. 75-2002PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Bell & Howell Co. (Bell & Howell) challenges an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) requiring Bell & Howell to bargain with Local 399, Operating Engineers (Local 399) as collective bargaining representative for Bell & Howell’s stationary engineers at its Lincoln-wood, Illinois facility.
Bell & Howell contends that it is not obligated to bargain with Local 399 because Local 399 allegedly discriminates against women in its membership policy and benefit plans. Bell & Howell also challenges certain evidentiary rulings made by the NLRB in the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Skyline Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Hartz Mountain Corporation v. Donald L. Dotson, Chairman, National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Jacob Abdalla and Mary T. Abdalla v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Graphic Arts International Union, Local No. 280 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.