Legal Opinion

Auernheimer v. Metzen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 11, 1989No. 87-CV-0187-WE; CA A49371Published

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Plaintiff appeals a trial court judgment denying foreclosure of a trust deed. On de novo review, we reverse.

In April, 1985, plaintiff sold a vacant parcel of real property to defendants. The unpaid balance of the purchase price was represented by a promissory note secured by a trust deed on the property. The trust deed provided that defendants would pay all taxes on the property “before any part of such taxes * * * become past due or delinquent * * The trust deed also provided:

“In the event the within described property, or any part thereof, or any interest therein, is sold, agreed to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Savings Bank Mutual v. BarnetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Benjamin Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API