Legal Opinion

Benjamin Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 26, 1987No. A8503-01671; CA A41211PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.

Defendants Eugene and Martha Parker (defendants) 1 appeal from a judgment which upheld plaintiffs acceleration of a note made by both defendants and a mortgage given by Martha alone to secure the payment of a loan from plaintiff. Plaintiff accelerated the obligations, because defendants sold the property on contract without first obtaining plaintiffs approval, as the mortgage required. The court awarded plaintiff a money judgment against defendants and ordered foreclosure of the mortgage to pay the judgment. The issue is whether plaintiff had the right to accelerate. We hold that it did and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Salishan Hills, Inc. v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Smith v. PilusoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. United Savings Bank Mutual v. BarnetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kerr v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Alderman v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Auernheimer v. MetzenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Auernheimer v. MetzenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Auernheimer v. MetzenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API