Legal Opinion

People v. Duncan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 5, 1982No. 80-778, 80-1110 consPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 604(a)(1) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110A, par. 604(a)(1)), the State appeals from an order granting defendants’ motions to quash their arrests and to suppress identification testimony. The State argues on appeal that the trial court erred in its ruling that because the prosecutors refused to disclose their informant’s identity, the information given by the informant could not be used to establish probable cause for the arrests. Further, the State contends that the photographic and lineup identifications of defendants were erroneously suppressed as being…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Martin F. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. The PEOPLE v. HesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. RaessAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. People v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. People v. StoicaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. People v. HodgesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. State v. WilsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API