Legal Opinion
State v. Wilson
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 2006No. 30360PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Michael D. Wilson appeals from his judgment of conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. Because we conclude that the trial court did not adequately consider whether the State should have been compelled to disclose the identity of a confidential informant who participated in the drug transaction, we remand this case for further proceedings.
I
BACKGROUND
An individual facing misdemeanor assault and theft charges informed police that he was interested in working as a confidential informant in exchange for leniency and that he could purchase illegal drugs from Wilson. Law…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. FarlowIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007