Legal Opinion

Sims v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 12, 1953No. Gen. 45,820PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Robson

This is an action for personal injuries by the plaintiff Vera Sims against the defendant, the Chicago Transit Authority. A jury trial resulted in a verdict of $25,000 against the defendant. The usual after-verdict motions were made and overruled by the trial court and judgment was entered on the verdict.

Defendant’s first contention for reversal is that plaintiff had no right to maintain her action since there had been no compliance with the .statute requiring that notice be served on the defendant. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1951, ch. 111⅔, sec. 341 [Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 21.2064(42)]. On August 1,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. OswaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Greenwald v. B. O. R. R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Beidler v. BranshawIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Wilson v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Barrett v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Geraghty v. Burr Oak Lanes, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Sims v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  3. Garrett v. Grant School District No. 124Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. MacLean v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Trowbridge v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API