Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. v. Taylor MacHine Works, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of defendant Taylor Machine Works, Inc. (“Taylor”) for dismissal under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7). As explained below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
FACTS
For purposes of this motion, we take the allegations in the complaint as true: In early 1991, Gallo Equipment Company (“Gallo”) asked plaintiff ORIX Credit Alliance, Inc. (“ORIX”) to provide it with financing in the amount of $400,000.00 to acquire marine forklift equipment. Because ORIX doubted Gallo’s credit-worthiness,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richard L. Gillman v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Roda v. BerkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- Kimmel v. PetersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Ronco, Inc. v. Plastics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tibor MacHine Products, Inc. v. Freudenberg-Nok General PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997