Tibor MacHine Products, Inc. v. Freudenberg-Nok General Partnership
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
Before the court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs recoupment and breach of contract claims under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated in this opinion, the defendant’s motion is denied in part and continued in part.
BACKGROUND
The defendant and counter-plaintiff, Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership (“FNGP”), supplies component parts to the automotive industry. The plaintiff and counter-defendant, Tibor Machine Products, Inc. (“Tibor”), is an Illinois corporation that produces “machined” parts. In…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Venture Associates Corporation, a Tennessee Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- ProCD, Inc. v. ZeidenbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- William Scott and Rosemary Scott v. James E. O'grady, Sheriff of Cook County, and Kelvin Branch, Deputy Sheriff of Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Cheryll GRAY, F/K/A Cheryll Lengyel, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF DANE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Low v. HenryTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Lincoln National Life Insurance v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Lagen v. United Continental Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Stanford v. Kraft Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- RBC Aircraft Products, Inc. v. Precise Machining & Manufacturing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.