Rue v. . Connell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
CONTROVERSY without action, submitted to 0. II. Allen, J., at June Term, 1908, of "Warren. From the judgment rendered the defendants Mary Sturges and Maude Connell appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtRkown, J.
The material facts in this controversy are as follows: Thomas Connell died in Warren County on 1 January, 1905, leaving a will, which was duly probated. The first clause of the will is: “To my wife, Addie May Connell, during her widowhood, I give, grant and bequeath all and every right, title and interest in and to my Tusculum plantation and all its belongings, after paying all my honest debts and my burial expenses. But should she bring forth an issue or issues (children) by me, they shall be the rightful heirs thereto at her marriage or death; but should there be no issue (children) by me…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alston v. . ConnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Chambers v. . KernsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1862
3Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of McLaughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Kirsher v. ToddMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Ellet v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Brown v. SchafferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Green v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.