Legal Opinion

Southern Surety Co. v. Diercks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1923No. 2714. [fn*]PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

In April, 1920, the appellant issued to the appellee a policy of insurance, which contained the following stipulation:

“If any sickness contracted by the insured during the term of this policy, when the insured is regularly treated by a legally qualified physician, necessarily and continuously confines the insured within the house, necessitating treatment thereat for a period beginning during said term, and prevents the insured throughout the period of such confinement from, performing any and every kind of duty pertaining to his occupation, the company will pay the insured for the period of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Breil v. Claus Groth Plattdutschen VereenNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Columbian Relief Fund Ass'n v. GrossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Petty Ex Rel. KauffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. American National Ins. Co. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. American Casualty Co. v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Federal Surety Co. v. WaiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Purcell v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API