Legal Opinion
Lamar Advertising v. State Dot.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 15, 1996No. 1941386, 1941387 and 1941396Published
1Concurrence 1
The problem presented in these cases centers around the proper construction of Ala. Code 1975, § 23-1-273(5), which is part of the Alabama Highway Beautification Act, § 23-1-270 et seq. The pertinent portion of § 23-1-273 states:
"No sign shall . . . be erected or maintained in an adjacent area after February 10, 1972, . . . except the following:
"(5) . . . [S]igns to be erected in business areas subsequent to February 10, 1972, which when erected, will comply with the provisions of Section 23-1-274. . . ."
(Emphasis added.) The first portion of § 23-1-271(1) of the Alabama Highway…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Maddox.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. Houston County Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ex Parte Alabama Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Department of Industrial Relations v. Little Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Hawley Fuel Corp. v. Burgess Mining & Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973