Legal Opinion

Lamar Advertising v. State Dot.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 15, 1996No. 1941386, 1941387 and 1941396Published

1Concurrence 1

The problem presented in these cases centers around the proper construction of Ala. Code 1975, § 23-1-273(5), which is part of the Alabama Highway Beautification Act, § 23-1-270 et seq. The pertinent portion of § 23-1-273 states:

"No sign shall . . . be erected or maintained in an adjacent area after February 10, 1972, . . . except the following:
"(5) . . . [S]igns to be erected in business areas subsequent to February 10, 1972, which when erected, will comply with the provisions of Section 23-1-274. . . ."

(Emphasis added.) The first portion of § 23-1-271(1) of the Alabama Highway…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Maddox.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Houston County Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Ex Parte Alabama Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Department of Industrial Relations v. Little Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Hawley Fuel Corp. v. Burgess Mining & Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API