Legal Opinion
United States v. Stewart Hymans and Mark Paynter
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1972No. 71-1407, 71-1441PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Perhaps the primary issue here to be resolved is whether nudity under the circumstances of this case constitutes “indecent conduct.” We conclude that it does. A bit of background information will place the controversy in focus.
As concerns National Forests, 16 U.S. C. § 551 provides, inter alia, that the Secretary of Agriculture “may make such rules and regulations * * * as will insure the objects of such reservations, namely, to regulate their occupancy and use and to preserve the forests thereon from destruction * *
Acting in a manner he deemed to be in accord with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Palmer v. City of EuclidSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. CassiagnolCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Don Sabin v. Earl H. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and Edward P. Cliff, Chief, U. S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Barry L. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Riley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER, ETC. v. BerglandDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.