Legal Opinion

McQuary v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 2007No. WD 67201PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge.

In this appeal we are required to determine whether a post-conviction motion, which alleges that a juror intentionally failed to disclose a close personal relationship with the State’s principal witness, states a claim that a resulting conviction “violates the constitution and laws of this state or the Constitution of the United States” within the purview of Rule 29.15(a) or raises mere trial error not cognizable in a post-conviction proceeding. Following an evidentiary hearing, the motion court denied various claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Crosswhite v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lance C. Shockley v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. Ferguson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Glaviano v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Brian Mann, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. DOUGLAS LEE STROSNIDER, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API