Legal Opinion

DOUGLAS LEE STROSNIDER, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 2016No. SD34299PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.

Douglas Lee Strosnider (“Movant”) appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his motion to set aside his conviction and 25-year sentence for first-degree statutory sodomy. 1 See Rule 29.15 2 and section 566.062, RSMo 2000.

In two points, Movant claims the motion court clearly erred because: (1) a juror “intentionally failed to disclose during voir dire that he knew [Movant’s] family and prejudice is presumed from such intentional non-disclosure”; and (2) Movant’s defense attorney (“trial counsel”) was ineffective in failing to “clarify” to the jury during the sentencing phase 3 of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. McLaughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. State v. MayesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Waggoner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Donald E. Riley v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Strosnider v. SteeleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API