DOUGLAS LEE STROSNIDER, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.
Douglas Lee Strosnider (“Movant”) appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his motion to set aside his conviction and 25-year sentence for first-degree statutory sodomy. 1 See Rule 29.15 2 and section 566.062, RSMo 2000.
In two points, Movant claims the motion court clearly erred because: (1) a juror “intentionally failed to disclose during voir dire that he knew [Movant’s] family and prejudice is presumed from such intentional non-disclosure”; and (2) Movant’s defense attorney (“trial counsel”) was ineffective in failing to “clarify” to the jury during the sentencing phase 3 of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- McLaughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State v. MayesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roberts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Waggoner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Donald E. Riley v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
- Strosnider v. SteeleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020