Legal Opinion

Powers Dry Goods Co. v. Nelson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1901PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Richland County; Glaspell, J. Action by the Powers Dry Goods Company against Neis Nelson. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The complaint states a cause of action for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant between February i- and May 6, 1900. A warrant of attachment was issued at the commencement of the action under subdivision 8, § 5352, Rev. Codes 1899, which subdivision provides that an attachment may be issued and levied upon personal property sold, in actions to recover the purchase price therefor. Under such warrant of attachment the sheriff of Richland county, wherein the action was pending, levied upon the goods sold, and also other personal property, and took the same into his possession. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hill v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Bank of Commerce v. ElliottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Bates v. TappanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Robinson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. Roberts v. WoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Adam v. McClintockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. John Leslie Paper Co. v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. H. E. Westerman Lumber Co. v. RaschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Jewett Bros. v. HuffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Burcell v. GoldsteinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API