State v. Sheets
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 When a mistrial is granted without the defendant’s consent and after jeopardy has attached, a *152retrial is barred by double jeopardy principles unless the mistrial was justified by a “ ‘manifest necessity.’ ” State v. Graham, 91 Wn. App. 663, 667, 960 P.2d 457 (1998) (quoting State v. Eldridge, 17 Wn. App. 270, 276, 562 P.2d 276 (1977)). Jayson P Sheets was charged with attempted second degree rape. During the trial, a State’s witness testified that the victim appeared intoxicated and he further testified that he based this opinion upon his perception that the victim had been flirting with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. HudlowWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HannaWashington Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State Of Washington, V David Roque-gasparCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State of Washington v. Jacob Nathaniel CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021