Legal Opinion

State v. Sheets

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 21, 2005No. 22926-2-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 When a mistrial is granted without the defendant’s consent and after jeopardy has attached, a *152retrial is barred by double jeopardy principles unless the mistrial was justified by a “ ‘manifest necessity.’ ” State v. Graham, 91 Wn. App. 663, 667, 960 P.2d 457 (1998) (quoting State v. Eldridge, 17 Wn. App. 270, 276, 562 P.2d 276 (1977)). Jayson P Sheets was charged with attempted second degree rape. During the trial, a State’s witness testified that the victim appeared intoxicated and he further testified that he based this opinion upon his perception that the victim had been flirting with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. HudlowWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. HannaWashington Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State Of Washington, V David Roque-gasparCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State of Washington v. Jacob Nathaniel CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API