Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Cannon
Court of Appeals of Maryland
' Appeal from the 'Circuit Court No. 2, of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The sole question for our consideration in this case is, whether the prayer for the appointment of receivers, *495contained in the bill filed by the appellee, should have been granted. The case was heard below on bill and answer, and the exhibits filed with them, and resulted in an order appointing receivers as prayed. From this order this appeal has been taken.
The case is not altogether free from difficulty, and was argued with marked ability. The view we have taken, however, will render it unnecessary to consider some of the important and interesting questions discussed at the hearing.
In 1880…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mason v. Pewabic Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Blondheim v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Mason v. Supreme Court of the Equitable LeagueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Steinberger v. Independent Loan & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Sylvester's Adm'r v. Willson's Adm'rsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1905
- Freemyer v. Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.