Legal Opinion

Pearson v. O'Neal-Letcher

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2007No. 24233PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Renee Christensen, attorney for plaintiff Susan Pearson, appeals the circuit court’s imposition of discovery sanctions against her in two consolidated personal injury cases. The circuit court imposed the sanctions because Christensen had solicited an opinion from plaintiffs physician regarding the permanency of plaintiffs injuries, yet Christensen failed to disclose the physician’s opinion in the defendants’ first discovery request. Rather, Christensen only disclosed the opinion when she later identified the physician as a trial witness. Because we conclude that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schrader v. TjarksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Chittenden & Eastman Co. v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Haberer v. Radio ShackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. S.D. Petroleum Release Compensation Fund v. BpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Novak v. NovakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Krueger v. Grinnell Mut. Reinsurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Eischen v. Wayne TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Eischen v. Wayne TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API