Legal Opinion

Kern County Department of Human Services v. Anna S.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 2000No. F033413PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, Acting P. J.

Anna S. appeals from the order terminating her parental rights to her sons Phillip F. (born Jan. 5, 1992) and George F. (born Jan. 19, 1993).1 (Welf. & Inst. Code,2 § 366.26.) The novel issue presented is whether a parent who is represented by counsel and fails to appear at the properly noticed section 366.26 hearing must be renoticed of the continued hearing date pursuant to section 366.23. We will hold that under the circumstances of this case, renotice need not comply with section 366.23 as long as it satisfies due process. Because the trial court’s finding that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commisson v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Parker v. DingmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Phillip F.California Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API