Legal Opinion
East Point Systems, Inc. v. Steven Maxim, S2K, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 21, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13-cv-00215-VABPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, East Point Systems, Inc. (“EPS”), Thomas Margarido, Jason Mar-gando, and Paul Taff, filed this action against Defendants, Steven Maxim, S2K, Inc. (“S2K”), Maxim Enterprises, Inc. (“MEI”), Maxim Field Service Supply, Inc. (“MFSS”), Edwin Pajemola, and Cleveland Field Systems, LLC (“CFS”) for breach of contract, statutory and common law breach of fiduciary duty, specific performance, tortious interference with business expectancy, violations of the Connecticut Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. §…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. Carington Mortgage ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Ralston Brown v. Carrington Mortgage ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Rodriguez v. FoxDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025