Legal Opinion

Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1988No. 53309-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

110 Wn.2d 128 (1988)

750 P.2d 1257

756 P.2d 142

JERRY ADKINS, ET AL, Appellants,

v.

ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA, Respondent.

No. 53309-1.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 3, 1988.

As amended by order June 9, 1988.

Duane Lansverk (of Landerholm, Memovich, Lansverk, Whitesides, Wilkinson, Klossner & Perry, Inc., P.S.), for appellants.

Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Hanna, Pendergrass, Hoffman, O'Connell & Goyak, by R. Daniel Lindahl, for respondent.

[As amended by order of the Supreme Court June 9, 1988.]

ANDERSEN, J.

FACTS OF CASE

This is a personal injury suit brought by Jerry Adkins[1] against…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Richard J. Teal and Tina Teal v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor v. Gilles & Cotting, Inc., and Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API