Fanoele v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action against the United States 1 under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) and § 2671 et seq. Before the court are the following:(1) Defendant United States’ motion (Doc. 223) to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6);(2) Plaintiffs motion (Doc. 227) for partial summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(a); and(3) Defendant United States’ Motion (Doc. 174) to designate Kansas City, Kansas as place of trial.
The basis…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Callahan v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Singh v. South Asian Society of George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Huminski v. RUTLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT.District Court, D. Vermont · 2002
- Huminski v. Rutland County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2002
- Ricardo Jose Rivera-Ortiz v. United States of America, et al.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.