Roe v. Norton
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Appellants, mothers of illegitimate children receiving Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) assistance, and the children, commenced this action challenging § 52-440b, Conn. Gen. Stat. Rev. (1973), * which requires the mother of an illegitimate child to divulge to designated officials the name of the putative father of the child. Noncompliance with the statute is a contempt punishable by imprisonment up to one year and a fine of up to $200. A three-judge District Court upheld the constitutionality of § 52-440b against appellants’ claims of denial of due process and equal protection…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Thompson v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Maher v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Doe v. MaherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.