Legal Opinion

Roe v. Norton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 24, 1975No. 73-6033PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants, mothers of illegitimate children receiving Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) assistance, and the children, commenced this action challenging § 52-440b, Conn. Gen. Stat. Rev. (1973), * which requires the mother of an illegitimate child to divulge to designated officials the name of the putative father of the child. Noncompliance with the statute is a contempt punishable by imprisonment up to one year and a fine of up to $200. A three-judge District Court upheld the constitutionality of § 52-440b against appellants’ claims of denial of due process and equal protection…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Thompson v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Maher v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Doe v. MaherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API