Legal Opinion
Hitoshi Yoshikawa v. Troy Seguirant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 25, 2022No. 21-15970PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HITOSHI YOSHIKAWA, No. 21-15970 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:18-cv-00162- JAO-RT TROY K. SEGUIRANT, Individually, Defendant-Appellant, OPINION and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; GREG TALBOYS; AGT CONSTRUCTION, LLC; JAMES A. SCHMIT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Jill Otake, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 14, 2022* San Francisco, California Filed July 25, 2022 * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Joan Opara v. Janet YellenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Hitoshi Yoshikawa v. Troy SeguirantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Barboza v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Bernal v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Crawford v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.