Legal Opinion

Food & Water Watch v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 26, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2017-1714Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOOD & WATER WATCH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-1714 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff, Food & Water Watch (“FWW”), has brought suit against three defendants, the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), the Farm Service Agency (“FSA”), and Deanna Dunning, in her official capacity as an FSA Farm Loan Officer (collectively, “defendants”), under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”),

5 U.S.C. §§ 551

et seq., and the National…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API