Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Floyd

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 21, 1980No. 78-2218/T4-250PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Judge.

The husband and wife in this dissolution proceeding jointly owned a number of rental and commercial properties acquired during their sixteen year marriage. All but three properties — a rental unit at 4740 Tuscarora Road, a commercial property on Chil-dre Avenue, and a vacant lot on Violet Street — were held in the parties’ joint names. The other three properties were titled solely in the husband’s name. The trial court found no “special equity” interest for either party in any of this property, and it allowed the ownership of the property to follow the title holder. We agree that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ball v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Williams v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Wollman v. WollmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  5. Long v. LongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hipps v. HippsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Wallace v. WallaceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. La Fleur v. La FleurDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API