Haggerty v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’CONNOR, Justice.
A jury found the appellant, James Edward Haggerty, guilty of burglary of a building with intent to commit theft. After finding two enhancement paragraphs to be true, the jury assessed punishment at 35-years confinement. We affirm.
The appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he has stated his opinion that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to the appellant, and the appellant was advised he has a right to file a pro se brief. The appellant has filed a pro se brief within the time allowed and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Ex Parte CruzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Mercado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chavez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Chavez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Peterson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
- Woods v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- FH1 Financial Services Inc. v. Debt Settlement America Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.