Legal Opinion

Haggerty v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided February 27, 1992No. 01-90-00642-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

A jury found the appellant, James Edward Haggerty, guilty of burglary of a building with intent to commit theft. After finding two enhancement paragraphs to be true, the jury assessed punishment at 35-years confinement. We affirm.

The appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he has stated his opinion that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to the appellant, and the appellant was advised he has a right to file a pro se brief. The appellant has filed a pro se brief within the time allowed and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Ex Parte CruzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Mercado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chavez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  2. Chavez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  3. Peterson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  4. Woods v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  5. FH1 Financial Services Inc. v. Debt Settlement America Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API