Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bowen v. Massachusetts

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 29, 1988No. 87-712Published

1Dissent

Justice Scalia,

with whom The Chief Justice and Justice .Kennedy join, dissenting.

The Court holds for the State because it finds that these suits do not seek money damages, and involve claims for which there is no “adequate remedy” in the Claims Court. I disagree with both propositions, and therefore respectfully dissent. ■

I

“The States of the Union, like all other entities, are barred by federal sovereign immunity from suing the United States in the absence of an express waiver of this immunity by Congress.” Block v. North Dakota ex rel. Bd. of Univ. and School Lands, 461 U. S. 273, 280…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API