Jacobs v. City of Asheville
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
The City contends the trial court erred in determining that the provision of the Asheville Civil Service law providing for a jury trial de novo is constitutional, and also erred in determining that plaintiff’s complaint does state a claim for which relief may be granted. The order entered by the trial court was clearly interlocutory. However, we have previously held that an order denying a motion for a jury trial is appealable because it deprives the appellant of a substantial right. In re Ferguson, 50 N.C. App. 681, 274 S.E.2d 879 (1981). Our Supreme Court has ruled that an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Revocation of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Warren v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re Reassignment of HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Warren v. AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Russ v. Board of Education of Brunswick CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harper v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- City of Asheville v. AlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- North Carolina Board of Mortuary Science v. Crown Memorial Park, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Blankenship v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007