Legal Opinion

Sargent v. Inhabitants of Hampden

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On Exceptions from Nisi Pri-us, Appleton, J., presiding. Case, to recover damages for an injury alleged to bave been received for want of proper repairs of an highway, which, defendants were bound to keep safe and convenient, Ac. The writ- was dated Jan’y 2, 1852. The alleged injury was sustained on Jan’y 28, 1846. The general issue was pleaded, and statute of limitations, with a brief statement of former proceedings and an adjudication thereon.

Read the full summary

On Exceptions from Nisi Pri-us, Appleton, J., presiding. Case, to recover damages for an injury alleged to bave been received for want of proper repairs of an highway, which, defendants were bound to keep safe and convenient, Ac. The writ- was dated Jan’y 2, 1852. The alleged injury was sustained on Jan’y 28, 1846. The general issue was pleaded, and statute of limitations, with a brief statement of former proceedings and an adjudication thereon. The matters in the brief statement referred to, are reported in 29 Maine, 70; and in 32 Maine, 78. After the plaintiff had introduced testimony…

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

— Public policy, and the better administration of justice require, that the professional intercourse between clients and their legal advisers should be free and unconstrained. And to this end, it is regarded so far confidential and privileged, that attorneys, counselors and solicitors are not obliged, nor permitted to disclose it, without the consent of their clients.

The reasons upon which this time honored rule of law is founded, may apply with equal force, where one makes application to counsel for professional services, although the relation of client and attorney, between them, do not, in…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. AyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. Lew Moy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  3. People v. PrattMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hartness v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Penny v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API