Legal Opinion
Arzu v. NYC Transit Authority
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided January 9, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*163OPINION OF THE COURT
Katherine A. Levine, J.
In this rarely ruled upon issue, the court must decide what the term “unreasonably delays” means, as contained in 11 NYCRR 65-3.9 (d), so as to warrant the stay of accumulation of interest that a no-fault applicant who timely files a lawsuit is ordinarily entitled to.
Plaintiff Lucia Arzu commenced this action on January 29, 2001 against defendant New York City Transit Authority seeking recovery of no-fault benefits in the amount of $25,000, attorney fees and interest at a rate of 2% per month. Defendant served its answer and discovery demands on July…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hospital for Joint Diseases v. Travelers Property Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- East Acupuncture, P.C. v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- LMK Psychological Services, P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- East Acupuncture, P.C. v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- All Boro Psychological Services, P.C. v. GEICO General InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2012
- Aminov v. Country Wide InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2014