Legal Opinion
LMK Psychological Services, P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 2009PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*221OPINION OF THE COURT
Pigott, J.
Plaintiffs, two medical providers that treated various automobile accident victims insured by defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, commenced this action against State Farm after it denied no-fault insurance benefit claims assigned to plaintiffs by the insureds. Plaintiffs asserted one cause of action for each insured treated, alleging that State Farm failed to pay or deny multiple bills within the requisite 30 days.
Plaintiffs were granted summary judgment awarding them, among other things, attorneys’ fees and interest. As relevant to this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Hospital for Joint Diseases v. Travelers Property Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. New York State Department of InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Council of New York v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- LMK Psychological Services v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by16 opinions
- Okslen Acupuncture P.C. v. DinalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Scholtisek v. Eldre Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Corona Heights Medical, P.C. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011
- Surgicare Surgical Associates v. National Interstate Ins.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2015
- Surgicare Surgical v. National Interstate InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.