Legal Opinion

Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue before this Court is whether Irwin A Popowsky, Pennsylvania Office of the Consumer Advocate (OCA) properly challenges the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission’s (PUC or Commission) exercise of its authority granted under 66 Pa.C.S. § 1501 to establish regulations governing the conditions under which public utilities shall be required to render service when it adopted certain regulations in 1996.

The OCA appeals from the PUC’s revised order entitled Final Rulemaking Re: Line *278Extension—52 Pa.Code §§ 65.21-65.22 (Revised Final Order) which adopted regulations…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arsenal Coal Co. v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ResourcesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Concerned Citizens v. Department of Environmental ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Neshaminy Water Resources Authority v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ResourcesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ondek v. Allegheny County CouncilCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Laurel Lake Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Fish & Boat CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. J.L. Moyer v. PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API