Legal Opinion
Blea v. Martinez
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided July 31, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00600Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JOSEPH BLEA, Petitioner, vs. No. CIV 20-0600 JB/KRS RICK MARTINEZ and the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court following Petitioner Joseph Blea’s failure to pay the habeas filing fee. The Court determined Blea is not eligible to proceed in forma pauperis in this action and ordered him to pay the $5.00 fee by July 26, 2020. See Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis at 1, filed June 26, 2020 (Doc. 4)(“IFP…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Olsen v. MapesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Advantedge Business Group, LLC v. Thomas E. Mestmaker & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Davis v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.