Medlock v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of unlawfully engaging in and pursuing the occupation or business of selling intoxicating liquor in the prohibition county of Gregg,' and his punishment assessed at the lowest authorized by law.
The evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the verdict It is unnecessary to recite it.
Appellant’s purported bill Ho. 1 shows that on the trial the district attorney presented another indictment against appellant for the same offense, and stated that he was going to dismiss that case, and did dismiss it. At first appellant objected, hut when the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Martoni v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Sweeney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918