Boersma v. Karnes
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Grant, J. -
Plaintiffs-appellants, Lloyd and Phyllis Boersma, filed a U.S. income tax return for 1984 on form 1040 and included one-half of their total Social Security benefits as income for federal tax purposes. Plaintiffs also filed a Nebraska individual income tax return for 1984 on form 1040N. Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-2795 (Reissue 1986), plaintiffs filed a claim for refund with defendant-appellee Donna Karnes, Nebraska Tax Commissioner. Plaintiffs contended that since one-half of their Social Security benefits had been indirectly taxed by the State of Nebraska, they were entitled…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- McWilliams v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Livengood v. Nebraska State Patrol Retirement SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services Finance & Support v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Firstier Bank, N.A. v. Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.