Legal Opinion

Boersma v. Karnes

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1988No. 86-196PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grant, J. -

Plaintiffs-appellants, Lloyd and Phyllis Boersma, filed a U.S. income tax return for 1984 on form 1040 and included one-half of their total Social Security benefits as income for federal tax purposes. Plaintiffs also filed a Nebraska individual income tax return for 1984 on form 1040N. Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-2795 (Reissue 1986), plaintiffs filed a claim for refund with defendant-appellee Donna Karnes, Nebraska Tax Commissioner. Plaintiffs contended that since one-half of their Social Security benefits had been indirectly taxed by the State of Nebraska, they were entitled…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McWilliams v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Livengood v. Nebraska State Patrol Retirement SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services Finance & Support v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Firstier Bank, N.A. v. Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API