Legal Opinion

Steele v. Shaffer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1928No. Docket No. 73PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

In the latter part of 1925 and the fore part of 1926, there was considerable activity in Muskegon in lake frontage on Lake Michigan. Defendant Page is a dentist, defendant Shaffer a real estate dealer. They had an option from defendants Fagan and Larsen of some lake frontage in Leelanau county. Plaintiffs are dentists and purchased the Leelanau county property of defendants Page and Shaffer in February, 1926. We are satisfied that none of these parties had seen the property before the sale. The purchase was for resale. The only question in the case is one of fact, i. e., whether defendants,…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mina v. General Star Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Columbus Pipe & Equipment Co. v. SefanskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Farley v. FarleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Kinek v. KinekMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API