Legal Opinion

Laur v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Lands of the plaintiffs are separated from those of defendant Plackbarth by the right of way of the Chicago & North Western Railroad. In their original state both parcels were low and swampy. Surface water originally flowed from the Laur to the Hackbarth property. The railroad’s right of way which separates plaintiffs’ property from that of Hackbarth is 100 feet wide. In 1890 the railroad built an embankment on it to carry its tracks across the lowland. The embankment is approximately 50 feet wide and 15 feet higher than the natural surface of the land.

Sec. 88.38, Stats., provides:

“Culverts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pettigrew v. Village of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Wilkins v. NicolaiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Shaw v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Borchsenius v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gannon v. HargadonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Soo Line Railroad v. Office of the Commissioner of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  2. Bratonja v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API