Bratonja v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.
The appeals are founded on the contentions that the sewer was inadequate to carry away the rainfall when built in 1906, that it became more inadequate as the years went by and more and more buildings were built in the area, thus increasing the fraction of the rainfall that ran down the street and collected in the low point, that the city had notice for many years that by reason of such inadequacies plaintiffs’ properties were flooded from time to time, and that the rainfall of July 27, 1949, was not extraordinary in amount or in rapidity of fall. It is urged that the city’s failure to install…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Columbia CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Hart v. City of NeillsvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Waters v. Village of Bay ViewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Geuder, Paeschke & Frey Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Peck v. City of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Barney's Furniture Warehouse of Newark, Inc. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Anhalt v. CITIES AND VILLAGES MUTUAL INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Tiedeman v. Village of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Welch v. City of AppletonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.