Legal Opinion

B.C. v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2020No. 17-1008Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 17-1008 ══════════ B.C., PETITIONER, v. STEAK N SHAKE OPERATIONS, INC., RESPONDENT ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS ══════════════════════════════════════════ PER CURIAM In this appeal, we consider whether a trial court’s recital in a final summary-judgment order that it considered “the pleadings, evidence, and arguments of counsel” included a late-filed response and attached evidence. The court of appeals concluded that the recital did not, and thus upheld…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. First United Pentecostal Church of Beaumont v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Binur v. JacoboTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API