Legal Opinion · Dissent

Prime v. District of Columbia Department of Public Works

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 2008No. 07-AA-1020Published

1DissentSchwelb, Senior Judge

This is a case in which, in my judgment, the equities strongly favor the petitioner. As my colleagues in the majority acknowledge, “petitioner’s is not an unsympathetic case.” The substantially more difficult issue is whether the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) abused his discretion in denying the petitioner’s motion for a new hearing. Although, given our deferential standard of review, the question is a close one as to which reasonable people might (and do) differ, I would answer it in the affirmative.

I

I begin by setting forth what I take to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re L.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Rhea v. Designmark Service, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. J. P. (Pat) Webb v. Standard Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. In re C.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API