Kirschner v. Greenfield
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ira Gammerman, J.
In this action seeking to impose a constructive trust on real property, plaintiff demanded a jury. Defendant moved to strike that demand alleging that the action was solely equitable in nature. On May 6, 1982, that motion was denied by Mr. Justice Klein in a decision in which he held that inasmuch as the complaint contained causes of action which were both legal and equitable in nature, plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial.* It is not clear from Mr. Justice Klein’s decision whether he meant that the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial on all issues…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vinlis Construction Co. v. RoreckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Chemical Bank v. Aetna InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Heller v. HackenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Kenford Co. v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Panarella v. Penthouse International Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Horger v. New York University Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986