Legal Opinion

Kirschner v. Greenfield

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ira Gammerman, J.

In this action seeking to impose a constructive trust on real property, plaintiff demanded a jury. Defendant moved to strike that demand alleging that the action was solely equitable in nature. On May 6, 1982, that motion was denied by Mr. Justice Klein in a decision in which he held that inasmuch as the complaint contained causes of action which were both legal and equitable in nature, plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial.* It is not clear from Mr. Justice Klein’s decision whether he meant that the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial on all issues…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vinlis Construction Co. v. RoreckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  2. Chemical Bank v. Aetna InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Heller v. HackenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  4. Kenford Co. v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. Panarella v. Penthouse International Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Horger v. New York University Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API