Legal Opinion

Padilla v. Damascus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotein, P. J.

By arrangement between the attorneys for the parties after joinder of issue in this personal injury action. *72plaintiff was examined in behalf of defendants by a Dr. Felix Grayson. At the time of the examination plaintiff’s attorney exhibited to Dr. Grayson “ all medical documents, reports and hospital records ” and thereafter forwarded to defendants’ attorney the report of plaintiff’s physician and an authorization to obtain and make copies of the hospital records. When a request for a copy of Dr. Grayson’s report was not honored, plaintiff moved for a direction that it be furnished.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lemon v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. McQuigan v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Falco v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Chase Watch Corp. v. HeinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Ehrlich v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kastner v. RodriquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Daguaro v. BratkeCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989
  3. Attard v. Tradewind Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Bradford v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API