Legal Opinion

Kohler v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 12, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-0207PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MENCER, District Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this diversity action against the defendant, the United States of America, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. Arguing that application of the FTCA and the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, 77 P.S. § 1 et seq. bar recovery in this case, the United States filed a Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Sum mary Judgment, along with briefs in support and the affidavits of Homer K. Browne, Jr., and Ralph Y. McKnight. Plaintiff has filed a brief in opposition to defendant’s motion and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. James F. Hunt and Carol Hunt v. United States of America. Catherine Strinni Hollar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Albert Roelofs, Jr. v. United States of America, the Travelers Insurance Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. William Rolick v. Collins Pine Company and Collins Pine Company, T/d/b/a Kane Hardwood DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Rolick v. Collins Pine Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Kohler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Pozza v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API