Richardson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
The Secretary of Labor (Secretary) petitions to review and set aside an order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (Commission). The petition for review does not involve factual issues. The challenge posed relates to the propriety of the legal conclusions reached by the Commission in arriving at its ruling that Cities Service Oil Co. (Cities) had not violated the general duty clause, 29 U.S.C.A. § 654(a)(1)-1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA), 29 U.S.C.A. § 651, et seq. A review of the pertinent and undisputed facts should…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Raymond Hendrix, D/B/A Alsea Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Budd Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Prescott v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1981
- Albert Peak v. Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Joseph and Barbara Wenzel v. Boyles Galvanizing Co., Black & Veatch, Jamie Edward Fallen v. Boyles Galvanizing Co., Black & VeatchCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Roach v. M/V Aqua GraceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Roach v. M/V Aqua GraceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.