Legal Opinion

Keith v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. S. H. Woodson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

Plaintiffs’ action is founded on a note executed to them by defendants. Defendants’ answer admits the execution of the note, and alleges total failure of consideration for the note, and also fraudulent representations by plaintiffs as to the patent right, the sale of which constituted the consideration for the note sued on. Plaintiffs’ reply admits that the note was executed for and in consideration of the sale of a patent rightbut they deny failure of consideration and fraud as alleged by defendants.

At the trial there was testimony on the part of defendants tending to show that the patent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Champlain Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  2. Rich v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
  3. Brooks v. StolleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1845
  4. Nash v. LullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. McClure v. JeffreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chaonia State Bank v. SollarsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Fitzgerald v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API