Brooks v. Stolley
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
[In equity. Bill by Moses Brooks and Joseph L. Morris against John H. Stolley to enjoin infringement of a patent for an improvement in wood-working machines, granted to William Woodworth December 27, 1828, and extended to his administrator February 1C, 1842.
1Opinion of the Court
McLEAN, Circuit Justice.
This is an application at chambers for an injunction to restrain the defendant from using a certain planing machine, claimed by the complainants under Woodworth’s patent. In their bill, the complainants set out the obtainment of the original patent by Woodworth, and the renewal of it by his administrator, the 16th November, 1842, all of which proceedings are alleged to be formal and valid: and they furtlier state that they are the assignees of the patent for Hamilton county, Ohio, and other territory, as specified in the assignment-; that in the above county, they have…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Crislip v. CainWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
- Carpenter v. . OsbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Horstmann v. LaFargueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Middlebrook v. . BroadbentNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.