Legal Opinion
Hermanos v. Royal Exchange Assur. Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 27, 1927No. 2156PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BINGHAM, Circuit Judge.
This is an action upon a policy of fire insurance covering plaintiff’s stock of shoes, in which they seek to recover the sum of $20,954.75, with interest; that being the sum claimed to be due them under the policy, after deducting its proportion of the net value of the property salvaged. The action was brought in the federal District Court for Porto Rico. The plaintiffs are a partnership, subjects of the king of Spain, residing in Porto Rico. The defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of England, where it is domiciled. The amount involved exceeds the sum of…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Giuseppe Lomartira, A.K.A. v. American Automobile Insurance Company, Giuseppe Lomartira, A.K.A. v. Queen Insurance Company of America, Dfendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Lomartira v. American Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965
- American Paint Service, Inc. v. The Home Insurance Company Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. StallardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Transportation Insurance Company, a Foreign Corporation v. Opal M. Hamilton, Doing Business as Opal M. Hamilton FashionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.