Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2007No. C051244CR; A131050PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

A jury convicted defendant of one count of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427(l)(a)(A), a Measure 11 offense for which a mandatory minimum sentence of 75 months is prescribed by ORS 137.700(2)(a)(P). The trial court concluded that the prescribed sentence would amount to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of Article I, section 16, of the Oregon Constitution. The court instead imposed a sentence of 16 months, the minimum presumptive sentence under the sentencing guidelines. The state appeals, assigning error to the court’s refusal to impose the Measure 11 sentence. Defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. Camacho-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. BuckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API